'Strong' and 'Global' Supervenience Revisited
Kim (Jaegwon)
Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48.2 (Dec. 1987), pp. 315-326
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    This paper corrects an error in my earlier paper, "Concepts of Supervenience1" ("Philosophy and Phenominological Research", Volume 45, 1984), and presents further material on supervenience2. The error is the claim that "global" supervenience3 entails "strong" supervenience4. However, it is argued that this failure of entailment only goes to show the inadequacy of global supervenience5 as an explication of "dependency" or "determination" relation, and, in particular, that materialism formulated in terms of global supervenience6 appears too weak. (It is pointed out, among other things, that global supervenience7 does not entail "weak" supervenience)8. A stronger form of global supervenience9, based on "similarity" rather than "indiscernibility" between worlds, is formulated and briefly discussed.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page