|The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument|
|Laurence (Stephen) & Margolis (Eric)|
|Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52 (2001), pp. 217-276|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Summary||Notes Citing this Paper||Link to Latest Write-Up Note|
Philosophers Index Abstract
Noam Chomsky's poverty of the stimulus argument is one of the most famous and controversial arguments in the study of language and the mind. Though widely endorsed by linguists, the argument has met with much resistance in philosophy. Unfortunately, philosophical critics have often failed to fully appreciate the power of the argument. In this paper, we provide a systematic presentation of the poverty of the stimulus argument, clarifying its structure, content, and evidential base. We defend the argument against a variety of philosophical criticisms, new and old, and argue that the poverty of the stimulus argument continues to deserve its guiding role in the study of language of the mind.
For a précis, see this Note1.
Write-up2 (as at 01/08/2017 13:56:38): Laurence+Margolis - Poverty of Stimulus
This note provides my detailed review of "Laurence (Stephen) & Margolis (Eric) - The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument".
Currently, this write-up is only available as a PDF. For a précis, click File Note (PDF). It is my intention to convert this to Note format in due course.
→ Further details to be supplied3.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - December 2017.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|