Endurance and Indiscernibility
Merricks (Trenton)
Source: Journal of Philosophy, vol. xci (1994) pp. 165–184
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    Mark persists from yesterday to today, the endurantist1 claims, if and only if Mark of yesterday "is identical with" Mark of today. A clear understanding of endurance, it is argued, requires a semantics for expressions like Mark of yesterday' and, generally, O at t.' I argue that once these expressions are properly understood, we can conclude that the familiar objection that endurance violates the indiscernibility of identicals2 is misguided. The analysis of expressions like 'O at t' also provides the resources for an account of what it is for an object to be "wholly present" at a time.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page