|Two Solutions To Chisholm's Paradox|
|Paper - Abstract|
Philosophers Index Abstract
Chisholm's paradox is that one plausible modal principle implies that certain changes in an artifact yield a different artifact, but another equally plausible principle says the changes preserve identity. Such paradoxes may be assimilated to classical sorites1 paradoxes, and a resolution transported from the classical to the modal case by introducing either a many-valued accessibility relation or a many-valued counterpart relation. The paper argues against the former solution, and for the latter.
From "Noonan (Harold), Ed. - Identity".
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - April 2018.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|