On What Possible Worlds Could Not Be
Stalnaker (Robert)
Source: Stalnaker - Ways a World Might Be, Chapter 2
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. This paper explores the analogy between mathematical Platonism and modal1 realism, and between Benacerraf's dilemma and the epistemological objection.
  2. It is argued that the parallels and contrasts may clarify both modal2 realism and the general problem of model epistemology.
  3. The paper begins with a sketch of Benacerraf's reasons for thinking that there is a prima facie conflict between a straightforward account of mathematical truth and a reasonable account of mathematical knowledge.
  4. It then develops presents a strategy to respond to the dilemma, and argues that this does not suggest a parallel response to the epistemological objection to modal3 realism.
  5. Finally, a more general problem for an epistemology of necessary truth is examined.

Comment:

Part I - Ways and Worlds

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page