Relativity and Persistence
Balashov (Yuri)
Source: Philosophy of Science 67 (2000): S549–S562
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. The nature of persistence of physical objects over time has been intensely debated in contemporary metaphysics. The two opposite views are widely known as “endurantism”1 (or “three-dimensionalism”) and “perdurantism2” (“four-dimensionalism”).
  2. According to the former, objects are extended in three spatial dimensions and persist through time by being wholly present at any moment at which they exist.
  3. On the rival account, objects are extended both in space and time and persist by having “temporal parts,” no part being present at more than one time.
  4. Relativistic considerations seem highly relevant to this debate. But they have played little role in it so far. This paper seeks to remedy that situation.
  5. I argue that considerations based on the special theory of relativity and the notion of coexistence favor perdurantism3 over endurantism4.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Apr 2020. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page