Vagueness by Numbers
Keefe (Rosanna)
Source: Mind 107.427, July 1998, pp. 565-579
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. Degree theories of vagueness build on the observation that vague predicates such as "tall" and "red" come in degrees. They employ an infinite-valued logic, where the truth values correspond to degrees of truth and are typically represented by the real numbers in the interval [0, 1].
  2. In this paper, the success with which the numerical assignments of such theories can capture the phenomenon of vagueness is assessed by drawing an analogy with the measurement of various physical quantities using real numbers.
  3. I argue that degree theories of vagueness are undermined by the failure of the necessary connectedness1 principle. Moreover, the semantics for the connectives entail that there must be a uniquely correct numerical assignment for the sentences, and this is implausible.
  4. Different senses of "coming in degrees" are then distinguished; I argue that a confusion between them could be the source of the degree theorist's error, and the distinction illuminates the problem cases described earlier in the paper.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2021
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2021. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page