Identity in the Loose and Popular Sense
Baxter (Donald L.M.)
Source: Mind, 97.3 (Oct. 1988), 575-582
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. This essay interprets Butler's distinction between identity in the loose and popular1 sense and in the strict and philosophical2 sense.
  2. Suppose there are different standards for counting the same things. Then what are two distinct things counting strictly may be one and the same thing counting loosely. Within a given standard identity is one-one. But across standards it is many-one.
  3. An alternative interpretation using the parts-whole relation fails, because that relation should be understood as many-one identity.
  4. Another alternative making identity relative to sort fails, because whole and parts can be of the same sort.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2020. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page