|Reply to Lynne Rudder Baker|
|Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Mar99, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p161, 6p;|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Summary||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper|
Philosophers Index Abstract
In "Was I Ever a Fetus?" I argued that, since each of us was once an unthinking fetus, psychological continuity1 cannot be necessary for us to persist through time. Baker claims that the argument is invalid, and that both the premise and the conclusion are false. I attempt to depend argument, premise, and conclusion against her objections.
Presents the reply of Eric Olson to Lynne Rudder Baker on the psychological continuity2 theory of identity. Argument on the usage of the de dicto principle in implying one's personality; Analogy of the Cartesian claim on the identity of a person as a human being; Assertion of the Biological View as a view of personal identity.
Response to "Baker (Lynne Rudder) - What Am I?".
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2018.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|