Could Extended Objects Be Made Out of Simple Parts? An Argument For 'Atomless Gunk'
Zimmerman (Dean)
Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March 1996; 56(1): 1-29
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    If a three-dimensionally extended object were completely decomposable into unextended "simple" parts, it would have to be either "closed", "open", or "partially open"--i.e., it would either have an outermost "skin" of simple parts, lack one, or have one on only part of its surface. The possibility of contact between extended objects raises difficulties for the assumption that all objects are closed, open, partially open, or any combination of these--unless one is prepared to admit that extended objects are not made entirely of simples. Conclusion: If there are extended objects, there is some "atomless gunk".

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page