Merricks on Whether Being Conscious is Intrinsic
Hawley (Katherine)
Source: Mind, 107, Number 428, October 1998, pp. 841-843
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperColour-ConventionsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. The paper is a response to "Merricks (Trenton) - Against the Doctrine of Microphysical Supervenience", Mind, 107, 1998, pp. 59-71.
  2. Merricks denies that the existence and intrinsic properties of things supervene1 upon the intrinsic properties of their microphysical parts and relations between those parts. He claims that the property being conscious is an intrinsic property of people although it does not supervene2 upon the microphysical basis.
  3. I argue, in response, that being conscious is not an intrinsic property of people. Something intrinsically exactly like me as I am now, but attached to an extra toe, would not3 be conscious.
  4. So Merricks has not discovered a counterexample to the doctrine of Microphysical Supervenience4.

Comment:



In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 3:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page