Animalism Versus Lockeanism: A Current Controversy
Noonan (Harold)
Source: Philosophical Quarterly, 1998, Vol. 48 Issue 192, p302, 17p;
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


  1. Claims that ‘animalism2' is amongst the various positions adopted by contemporary philosophers, in relation to personal identity;
  2. Reference to how philosopher Locke discussed personal identity;
  3. Opposition to Locke's perception;
  4. Consideration of how the neo-Lockean might respond to the animalist3's position;
  5. Inclusions in the options available to the philosopher of personal identity when considering the relation between persons and human beings.


See "Mackie (David) - Animalism Versus Lockeanism: No Contest" for a reply.

In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 1: I’m not sure where this abstract came from!

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page