Multiple Personality and Personal Identity
Brown (M.T.)
Source: Philosophical Psychology, Volume 14, Number 4, 1 December 2001, pp. 435-447(13).
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryNotes Citing this PaperText Colour-Conventions


Author’s Introduction

  1. If personal identity consists in non-branching psychological continuity1, then the sharp breaks in psychological connectedness characteristic of Multiple Personality Disorder implicitly commit psychological continuity2 theories to a metaphysically extravagant reification of alters.
  2. Animalist3 theories of personal identity avoid the reification of alternate personalities by interpreting multiple personality as a failure to integrate alternative autobiographical memory schemata.
  3. In the normal case, autobiographical memory cross-classifies a human life, and in so doing provides access to a variety of interpretative frameworks with their associated clusters of general event memory and episodic memory. Multiples exhibit erratic behavior because they cannot access reliably the intersecting autobiographical memory schemata that permit graceful transitions between social roles, behavioral repertoire and emotional dispositions. Selves, in both normal and certain pathological cases, are best understood as semi-fictional narratives created by human animals4 to serve their social, emotional and physical needs.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page