|The Survival of the Sentient|
|Source: Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 14, Oct2000, p325, 24p|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Colour-Conventions||Disclaimer|
Argues that with the biological approach, there cannot possibly be any philosophically adequate view of our existence or persistence. View that psychological approach is the only adequate approach for those non-personal sentient beings who will be found with typical living animals in the normal course of events; Conjecture that perhaps there are no ordinary entities.
… Note: Finessing Questions about Materially Coincident Entities.
Footnote 4: “Serson” / “Seople” is Unger’s neologism for the sentient, whether or not they are persons.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2020.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|