Brain Death and Personal Identity
Green (Michael) & Wikler (Daniel)
Source: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1980, 105-133
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    We provide a definitive affirmative answer to the philosophical question of whether a brain-dead patient is dead. The account differs radically from any others. Alternative rationales have relied exclusively on either biological or moral criteria to support a redefinition. Our account relies exclusively on "ontological" considerations. Applying the most viable theory of personal identity, we argue that the necessary conditions for the brain-dead patient to be the individual jones are not fulfilled, so that jones, having ceased to exist, is dead. This ontological account, which relies only on common conceptual intuitions, provides the first good rationale for the current massive legal and medical redefinition of brain-death as death. We finally argue that even those unpersuaded by our theoretical account should, for moral reasons, favor progressive legislation that admits brain-death, since it avoids slippery slope difficulties that the alternatives face and would be immune to abuse. (Edited)

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2020. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page