- When a problem has been around as long as has the problem of minds and machines (or, for that matter, its twin – the problem of ‘other minds’) without either being very productive or being laid to rest, it is perhaps time to look beyond simple conceptual muddles and unclarities to deeper sources in philosophic practices and assumptions that enter undiscussed.
- To get the proper measure of the problem it may even be necessary to go beyond the stricter bounds of philosophy itself to look at the sources and role of certain philosophic views and problems in a wider social context, to provide what might be called a ‘social pathology’ of the problem.
- But though this may provide some understanding of the longevity of certain muddles, it raises, in its turn questions about the nature of philosophic problems that I do not see my way clear to tackling.
- I will confine myself to trying to bring out the basic muddle in the notion of ‘machine intelligence’, that is, the contradictions lying between the conditions of application of its two parts, and the slightly different muddle lying similarly at the centre of the now more popular notion of ‘artificial intelligence’. I shall also make some suggestions about the social roots.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
- Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)