|Abortions and Distortions: An Analysis of Morally Irrelevant Factors in Thomson's Violinist Thought Experiment|
|Source: Social Theory & Practice, Jan2001, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p129-148, 20p|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Disclaimer|
Philosophers Index Abstract
Certain thought experiments1, analogous in all the morally relevant ways to Judith Thomson's famous violinist scenario, elicit responses contrary to those that she produces in her readers. The former indicate that individuals don't have a right to withhold lifesaving aid. Drawing upon Peter Unger's ideas, an argument is made that there are distortional features at work in Thomson's thought experiment2. These features cut off readers from their deepest moral commitments and, thus, their intuitive reactions to Thomson's scenario should not be trusted. So if aborting3 a person is analogous to disconnecting the violinist, then it too is morally indefensible.
Discusses an argument on the abortion4 rights of women. Principle of minimizing harm to innocents; Moral values against abortion5.
For the full text, see Hershenov - Abortions and Distortions: An Analysis of Morally Irrelevant Factors in Thomson's Violinist Thought Experiment.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2020.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|