Harming the Non-conscious
Persson (Ingmar)
Source: Bioethics, 13.3-4, July 1999
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus1 before it acquires consciousness can harm it.
  2. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non-conscious fetus2.
  3. But this implies that the non-conscious fetus3 can be harmed.
  4. The mistake lies in thinking that, since existence can be intrinsically bad for a being only if it is conscious, it can be harmed only if it is conscious.
  5. In fact, its being harmed only implies that it could have been conscious (and led a good life).

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page