The Role of Philosophy in the Contemporary Abortion Debate.
Koritansky (Peter)
Source: Christian Bioethics, Jan-Apr2004, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p63-67, 5p
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. In order to confront the pro-abortion1 position in its most radical form, a much more complex philosophical argument must be given.
  2. Following thinkers such as MacIntyre (Alasdaire), Christian philosophers must articulate and promote a philosophical position according to which morality is conceived in richer terms than the mere respecting of individual rights.
  3. The social dimension of human nature must be rediscovered in order that the happiness and welfare of others becomes a desirable goal in and of itself.
  4. According to a morality where individual rights is the bottom line (for example, that of Thompson (Judith Jarvis)), women very well may have the right to "extricate" themselves from their pregnancy2 even when doing so will result in the death of their child.
  5. What must be explained, therefore, is the more profound insight that social morality is equally concerned with obligations to others, including those who are most helpless3 and unable to speak for themselves. (edited)

Author's Abstract
  1. Inspired by "Lee (Patrick) - A Christian Philosopher’s View of Recent Directions in the Abortion Debate", this essay raises the question of how effective philosophical arguments can be in determining the moral status of legalized abortion4.
  2. On one hand, Christian philosophers have been successful5 in explaining both the humanity and the personhood of the unborn child, as well as exposing the incoherence of those who would deny the unborn child’s humanity or personhood. Nevertheless, in order to confront the pro-abortion6 position in its most radical form, a much more complex philosophical argument must be given.
  3. Following thinkers such as MacIntyre (Alasdaire), Christian philosophers must articulate and promote a philosophical position according to which morality is conceived in richer terms than the mere respecting of individual rights.
  4. The social dimension of human nature must be rediscovered in order that the happiness and welfare of others becomes a desirable goal in and of itself.
  5. According to a morality where individual rights is the bottom line (for example, that of Thompson (Judith Jarvis)), women very well may have the right to “extricate” themselves from their pregnancy7 even when doing so will result in the death of their child.
  6. What must be explained, therefore, is the more profound insight that social morality is equally concerned with obligations to others, including those who are most helpless and unable to speak for themselves.



In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 3: Footnote 5:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page