Reason and History in Locke's Second Treatise
Tarlton (Charles D.)
Source: Philosophy - 79, Apr2004, Issue 308, p247-279, 33p
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Philosopher’s Index Abstract

  1. Argues that Locke's idiosyncracy as an Exclusion Whig writer forces him to adopt an exceptionally intense radicalism, embracing both political resistance and the deposing of the king.
  2. Miscalculations in the repeated efforts at a direct historical substantiation of Locke's position in the early chapters of the "Second Treatise";
  3. Miscalculations about the role of consent in his accounts of the origins of government;
  4. Rationalist arguments for consent;
  5. Secondary state of nature atop pre-existing government;
  6. Consensual theory;
  7. General concept of wrongdoing.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2025
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2025. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page