| Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness |
|---|
| Viger (Christopher) |
| Source: Mind and Language, Volume 20, Number 3, June 2005, pp. 313-325(13) |
| Paper - Abstract |
| Paper Statistics | Books / Papers Citing this Paper | Notes Citing this Paper | Disclaimer |
Philosophers Index AbstractJerry Fodor's argument for an innate language of thought continues to be a hurdle for researchers arguing that natural languages provide us with richer conceptual systems than our innate cognitive resources. I argue that because the logical/formal terms of natural languages are given a use-theory of meaning, unlike predicates, logical/formal terms might be learned without a mediating internal representation. In that case, our innate representational system might have less logical structure than a natural language, making it possible that we augment our innate representational system and improve our ability to think by learning a natural language.
Comment:
For the full text, follow this link (Local website only): PDF File1.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
| © Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2025. | Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. | File output: Website Maintenance Dashboard | Return to Top of this Page | Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page | Return to Theo Todman's Home Page |