|Lewisian Realism: Methodology, Epistemology, and Circularity|
|Cameron (Ross P.)|
|Source: Synthese (A slightly shorter version of this paper is forthcoming …)|
|Paper - Abstract|
In this paper I argue that warrant for Lewis’ Modal1 Realism is unobtainable. I consider two familiar objections to Lewisian realism — the modal2 irrelevance objection and the epistemological objection — and argue that Lewis’ response to each is unsatisfactory because they presuppose claims that only the Lewisian realist will accept. Since, I argue, warrant for Lewisian realism can only be obtained if we have a response to each objection that does not presuppose the truth of Lewisian realism, this circularity is vicious. I end by contrasting Lewis’ methodology with Forrest’s in order to illustrate a rival method that does not fall victim to the objection I lay against Lewis.
See Link (Defunct).
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2018.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|