- In "Pinillos (N. Ángel) - Counting and Indeterminate Identity", N. Angel Pinillos develops an argument that there can be no cases of 'Split Indeterminate Identity1'. Such a case would be one in which it was indeterminate whether a=b and indeterminate whether a=c, but determinately true that b ¬= c.
- The interest of the argument lies, in part, in the fact that it appears to appeal to none of the controversial claims to which similar arguments due to Gareth Evans and Nathan Salmon appeal.
- I argue for two counter-claims.
- First, the formal argument fails to establish its conclusion, for essentially the same reason Evans's and Salmon's arguments fail to establish their conclusions.
- Second, the phenomena in which Pinillos is interested, which concern the cardinalities of sets of vague objects, manifest the existence of what Kit Fine called 'penumbral connections', phenomena that the logics Pinillos considers are already known not to handle well.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
- Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)