Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice
Rachels (Stuart)
Source: Ryberg (Jesper) & Tännsjö (Torbjörn), Eds. - The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics, pp. 163-186
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Philosopher’s Index Abstract

  1. A set of arguments shows that either the Repugnant Conclusion and its variants are true or the better-than relation isn’t transitive. Which is it?
  2. This is the most important question in population ethics. The answer will point the way to Parfit’s1 elusive Theory X.

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page