|Source: Southern Journal of Philosophy 42, 2002, pp. 211-216|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Disclaimer|
Philosophers Index Abstract
An argument is made against the existence of scattered artifacts. This claim is based on the belief that there is no compelling way to distinguish a scattered object1 such as a dissembled watch on the repairman's table from similar watch parts in the garbage that don't compose any entity. Some proposed solutions to the puzzle are rejected because they bestow too much power on the intentions of those who might reassemble the parts. Others are rejected because they imply a form of backward causation2 in which future events determine whether something in the present exists.
For the full text, see Hershenov - Scattered Artifacts.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2019.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|