Naming and Necessity: Appendix - Kripke’s Response To His Critics
Kripke (Saul)
Source: Kripke - Naming and Necessity, 1980, Preface, pp. 7-21
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperLink to Latest Write-Up Note

Sections1

  1. Non-Unique Names
  2. The Relation of Rigidity to Scope
  3. Why did Russell et al Oppose the Rigidity of Names?
  4. Possible Worlds
  5. Substitutability of Proper Names?
  6. Rigidity and Non-Existence

Write-up2 (as at 01/08/2017 00:11:31): Kripke - Naming and Necessity - Appendix

I wrote a detailed review and analysis of the whole book – "Kripke (Saul) - Naming and Necessity" – when an undergraduate at Birkbeck. This document is still in a single pdf (see this link). However, I intend to break it out into individual Notes by Section. The “sectioning” is not Kripke’s, but relates to my analysis in the above document.
This – "Kripke (Saul) - Naming and Necessity: Appendix - Kripke’s Response To His Critics" – is the second 2/3 of the Preface only. See "Kripke (Saul) - Naming and Necessity: Preface" for the former part.

In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 1: Footnote 2:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026


© Theo Todman, June 2007 - March 2026. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page