Material Persons and the Doctrine of Resurrection
Baker (Lynne Rudder)
Source: Faith and Philosophy 18 (2001): 151-167
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this Paper


Author’s Abstract

  1. Many Christians assume that there are only two possibilities for what a human person is:
    • either Animalism1 (the view that we are fundamentally animals)
    • or Immaterialism (the view that we are fundamentally immaterial souls).
  2. I set out a third possibility: the Constitution View2 (the view that we are material beings, constituted by bodies but not identical to the bodies that now constitute us.)
  3. After setting out and briefly defending the Constitution View3, I apply it to the doctrine of resurrection.
  4. I conclude by giving reasons for Christians to prefer the Constitution View4 of human persons to both Animalism5 and Immaterialism.

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page