Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-emption Problem
Menzies (Peter)
Source: Mind, 105, No. 417, Jan., 1996, pp. 85-117
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

    I argue that it is impossible to provide a reductive analysis of singular causation1, whether deterministic or probabilistic, in terms of probabilistic relations and/or counterfactuals. A problem, which I call the preemption problem, proves to be an insuperable obstacle for any such reductive analysis. I direct this argument against David Lewis's counterfactual theory of causation2. I argue that the correct conclusion to draw from the failure of such reductive analyses is that singular causation3 has to be treated as theoretical entity. I offer an definition of singular causation4 as a theoretical entity, applying David Lewis's own refinement of the Ramsey-Carnap theory of scientific theoretical terms. I use the resulting definition to resolve the preemption problem.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page