Why Hacking is Wrong about Human Kinds
Cooper (Rachel)
Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, Number 1, March 2004, pp. 73-85(13)
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Philosopher’s Index / Ingenta Abstract

  1. ‘Human kind’ is a term introduced by Ian Hacking to refer to the kinds of people — child abusers, pregnant1 teenagers, the unemployed — studied by the human sciences.
  2. Hacking argues that classifying and describing human kinds results in feedback, which alters the very kinds under study. This feedback results in human kinds having histories totally unlike those of natural kinds2 (such as gold, electrons and tigers), leading Hacking to conclude that human kinds are radically unlike natural kinds3.
  3. Here I argue that Hacking's argument fails and that he has not demonstrated that human kinds cannot be natural kinds4.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page