Identity, Killing, and the Boundaries of Our Existence
DeGrazia (David)
Source: Philosophy and Public Affairs. Fall 03; 31(4): 413-442
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

    The essay addresses central themes of McMahan's The Ethics of Killing and Boonin's A Defense of Abortion1. The most general theme is that philosophical argument can settle some of the "marginal cases"--issues concerning contestable moral status and/or the boundaries of our existence. McMahan provocatively argues that personal identity theory can illuminate these issues. I reject McMahan's account of identity while endorsing his account of what matters2 in survival. I also contend that, suitably combined (and modified), McMahan's and Boonin's arguments greatly advance a liberal approach to abortion3. Finally, I address the definition of death and the authority of advance directives in dementia cases, with special attention to personal identity theory.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page