Philosophical Method and The Theory of Predication and Identity
Castaneda (Hector-Neri)
Source: Nous, Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1978), pp. 189-210
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    The problems of referential opacity in psychological contexts require a solution, of which three types are indicated, that contains a profound theory of predication, identity, and individuation1. A radical theory, not in the spirit of the current fashions, is outlined. It is called the guise-consubstantiation, conflation, and consociation theory. This theory was first expounded in "Thinking and the structure of the world," "Philosophia" (1974) and "Critica" (1972). The present paper is an introduction to this essay, motivated by two criticisms of Romane Clark in "Not every object of thought has being," "Nous" (1978). It is shown that Clark's arguments rest on equivocations, one involving the data and the theory, and the other within the theory itself. Thus, a discussion of philosophical method turns out to be crucial, and an analysis of expression 'true of' is offered.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page