Graham Priest's 'Dialectheism' - Is It Altogether True?
Peña (Lorenzo)
Source: Sorites 7, November 1996: 28-56
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryText Colour-Conventions


Author’s Abstract

    Graham Priest’s book In Contradiction is a bold defense of the existence of true contradictions. Although Priest’s case is impressive, and many of his arguments are correct, his approach is not the only one allowing for true contradictions. As against Priest’s, there is at least one contradictorialist approach which establishes a link between true contradictions and degrees of truth. All in all, such an alternative is more conservative, closer to mainstream analytical philosophy. The two approaches differ as regards the floodgate problem. Priest espouses a confinement policy banning contradictions except in a few special domains, particularly those of pure semantics and set-theory (and perhaps arithmetics), whereas the alternative approach admits two negations — natural or weak negation and strong negation, the latter being classical; accordingly, the alternative approach prohibits any contradiction involving strong negation, thus providing a syntactic test of what contradictions have to be rejected.

Comment:

Filed electronically with the full edition of Sorites 07

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page