Fodor's Epistemic Intuitions of Analyticity
Wright (Wayne)
Source: Sorites 14, October 2002: 110-116
Paper - Abstract

Paper Summary


Author’s Abstract

    This paper argues that Jerry Fodor fails to adequately motivate his informational semantics because he does not exclude molecularism, a principal rival to his account of concepts. Supporting my position are Fodor’s inability to explain away the strong intuitions often held on behalf of analyticity and his not offering a convincing argument for his claim that there is no way of making a principled analytic/synthetic distinction. Since he wishes to defend necessity and a prioricity, both of which are condemned by the Quinean anti-analyticity arguments, while denying analyticity, Fodor must provide an anti-analyticity argument of his own if his informational semantics is to be accepted. The result is that we have no reason to abandon the claim that there are meaning-constitutive interconceptual connections in favor of Fodor’s atomistic informational semantics.

Comment:

Filed electronically with the full edition of Sorites 14

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page