Water, Phlogiston, Brains, and Vats
Haukioja (Jussi)
Source: Sorites 14, October 2002: 16-20
Paper - Abstract

Paper Summary


Author’s Abstract

    Ted A. Warfield (1998) has presented a new version of the Putnamian1 argument for the conclusion that we are not brains in a vat. Warfield’s version relies on widely held views about content externalism and self-knowledge, but he intends his version to avoid reliance on other, more questionable background assumptions which other versions have made. Anthony Brueckner (2001) claims, however, that Warfield’s version fails. In this paper I will argue that, even if Brueckner’s reply succeeds, it leaves room for a new version of the argument. The new version relies on assumptions no more objectionable than Warfield’s, yet it is immune to Brueckner’s objection.

Comment:

Filed electronically with the full edition of Sorites 14

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page