Theo Todman's Web Page - Paper Abstracts

Author’s Abstract

1. In this paper, I argue that neither the #257 argument nor the #258 argument in Wittgenstein¹’s Philosophical Investigations undermines the coherence of the Cartesian Model, according to which a sensation word, such as ‘headache’ or ‘tickle’, gets its meaning in virtue of an act of ‘inner’ association or ostensive definition.
2. In addition, I argue against the standard assumption that the diarist’s language of #258 is logically private.