Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume and Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas
McKinnon (Rhys)
Source: Sorites 16, December 2005
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

    Many believe that George Berkeley (Principles of Human Knowledge) and, subsequently, David Hume (A Treatise of Human Nature) offer devastating arguments against John Locke’s (An Essay Concerning Human Understanding) theory of abstract ideas. It is the purpose of this paper to clarify the attacks given a close reading of Locke. It will be shown that many of the arguments of Berkeley and Hume are of a straw man nature and, moreover, that some of their conclusions are actually in accord with Locke.


Filed electronically with the full edition of Sorites 16

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page