Personal Identity and Survival
Robinson (John)
Source: Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 85, No. 6, Jun., 1988, pp. 319-328
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperColour-ConventionsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. The author critically examines Derek Parfit1's arguments that full psychological continuity2 and connectedness3 provide all that matters4 to us in our survival.
  2. Two arguments are furnished which undermine Parfit5's conclusion. The first uses a thought experiment6 which demonstrates that even where there is full psychological continuity7 and connectedness8 between oneself and a future person, there can be a better candidate9 for one's survivor.
  3. The second argument examines the empirical data which Parfit10 adduces in support of his argument. Experimental results are described which undermine Parfit11's conclusions about actual split-brain12 patients and suggest that the kind of fission that he describes is quite impossible.
  4. The author concludes that there is more to one's survival13 than full psychological continuity14 and connectedness15 between oneself and a future person.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2020. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page