Meeting the Hare in her Doubles: Causal Belief and General Belief
Sainsbury (Mark)
Source: In "Impressions of Hume" edited by M Frasca-Spada and P Kail. OUP 2005
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

    Hume's second definition of causation1 defines belief in a causal generalization in terms of causal relations between beliefs which do not have causal content. The idea is instructive: but can it do justice to the distinction between accidental generalizations (including accidental generalizations about causal relations) and nonaccidental, genuinely causal, generalizations? The paper argues that although it cannot accomplish precisely this, it can throw light on the contents of beliefs in other ways.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Feb 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page