|Comment on Lockwood|
|Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, Jun., 1996, pp. 222-228|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Colour-Conventions||Disclaimer|
At the philosophical foundations of our best and deepest theory of the structure of reality, namely quantum mechanics1, there is an intellectual scandal that reflects badly on most of this century's leading physicists and philosophers of physics. One way of making the nature of the scandal plain is simply to observe that this paper by Lockwood is untainted by it. Lockwood2 gives us an up-to-date investigation of metaphysics, and discusses the implications of quantum theory3 for some of the bread-and-butter concepts of philosophy, such as reality, the self, and causality4. The scandal is that there is very little other work of that description in the literature, and what little there is is systematically disregarded by mainstream thinking in both philosophy and physics. Despite the unrivalled empirical success of quantum theory5, the very suggestion that it may be literally true as a description of nature is still greeted with cynicism, incomprehension, and even anger. Final Paragraph
Lockwood is one of very few philosophers who have defied conventional philosophical wisdom by taking the trouble to learn what the fundamental theories of physics actually say. A few physicists are likewise beginning to realize that the sheer philosophical naivete that still prevails in the profession has prevented our most important theories from being properly understood and has seriously impeded progress. The twentieth century has been a veritable dark age for metaphysics – indeed it has been characterized by the explicit repudiation of metaphysics both by philosophers and by physicists. Now that the lights seem to be coming on again, we are in a position to enjoy the one beneficial side-effect of the long darkness: a backing of wonderful, urgent philosophical problems, raised by scientific advances in the intervening period. The problems raised by quantum theory6 are among the most conspicuous of these. Lockwood and a few others have made a start at addressing them. Let us hope that we are witnessing a return to rationality in these matters.
Response to "Lockwood (Michael) - 'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" - Symposium: 'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanic7s
Footnote 2: See "Lockwood (Michael) - 'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics".
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2020.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|