How Cartesian Dualism Might Have Been True
Chalmers (David)
Source: Website
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryNotes Citing this PaperText Colour-Conventions


Full Text

  1. We could have been characters in a huge computer simulation. It is a familiar idea that the whole world might be simulated on a computer, and things would seem exactly the same to us (and indeed, who is to say that we are not).
  2. I imagine, though, a different sort of simulation, of the kind common in the fields of artificial intelligence and artificial life, where we have (1) a simulated environment and (2) simulated beings which are "moving" through this environment, according to a program that models these beings' thought processes and their decisions. Imagine a very complex project like this (like the vivarium, say), perhaps with genetic algorithms which get more and more complex and sophisticated, until eventually very sophisticated, rational beings evolve.
  3. When they speculate about the world, they will find that the environment possess certain regularities, and this will lead them to laws of "physics" about their external world. This will lead them to speculate about whether they too, at the bottom line, are subject to the same laws. This might seem plausible...but of course it will not be the case! Their "mental" life obeys a completely different set of laws, and further these laws are off limits for direct observation. Their mental life takes place not within their world at all, but within a computer in a completely different universe! When it comes to observing the "laws" of their behaviour, they will reach some dead end in looking for causal mechanisms. Unlike our world, such mechanisms are simply not "locally supported" by simple physical laws. I'm not quite sure what would happen next.
  4. If they tried to "look inside their heads" (assuming they have at least vaguely coherent senses)... They'd just find an empty box. They'd ask "how can I do all this complex processing". The answer would have to be, well, I'm just kind of non-material mind. Of course, there would be a breakdown in the usual kind of physical causation around the "heads" of such a being, unlike our world.
  5. Moral: Cartesian Dualism isn't quite so outlandish and conceptually problematic as tends to be supposed.

Comment:

Matrix; Web Link (http://consc.net/notes/dualism.html) Defunct.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2017
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - December 2017. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page