Statues and Their Constituents: Whether Consitution is Identity
Francescotti (Robert)
Source: Metaphysica 4.2 (2003), pp. 59-78
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. This paper examines two popular arguments for the non-identity of the statue1 and its constituent material.
  2. An essentialist response is provided to one of the arguments; that response is then shown to undermine the other argument as well.
  3. It is also shown that even if we accept these arguments and concede non-identity, we can still avoid the further conclusion that constitution is not identity.
  4. These ideas are then extended to other applications of the arguments for non-identity (specifically, their application to a person and the constituent body, and to a mental event and its constituent neural event).

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page