Survival and Importance
Brennan (Andrew)
Source: Analysis, vol. 47, 1987, pp. 225-230
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Philosophers Index Abstract

    It is argued that Parfit1's account of personal survival fails to recognise a critical ambiguity in our conception of what is important in human life. Two modes of valuing persons are introduced, these modes being linked to two different causal roles that items can play in the production of further items. The distinction between "production" and "copying" processes helps to avoid confusion in the discussion of problems about replication2 and survival.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page