Skepticism and Nihilism
Unger (Peter)
Source: Nous, Vol. 14, No. 4, Special Issue on Epistemology, Nov., 1980, pp. 517-545
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Philosophers Index Abstract

  1. A dialectical argument is offered against the common sense view of things. This involves mutually reinforcing arguments for metaphysical nihilism1 and epistemological skepticism.
  2. The key idea is to give the evil demon's place in the Cartesian skeptical argument to a newly devised "sorites2" against the self3. That yields arguments that the reader knows nothing for certain and, eventually, is not even reasonable in believing anything.
  3. These arguments are offered as an improvement on some in the author's Ignorance4.
  4. The point of both skepticism and nihilism5 will be exploited once there is developed an appropriate precise language.

In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 4:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Feb 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page