A Review of David Chalmers' essay 'The Matrix as Metaphysics'
Lloyd (Peter)
Source: Website
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this Paper


Sections

  1. Opening gambit: the envatted person is wrong, very wrong
  2. Digression: How to tell whether you are in the Matrix
  3. Chalmers claims to reject Berkeley
  4. Envatting reconsidered
  5. The implicit simpleness of elementary physical entities
  6. Semantic chicanery
  7. Confusion over real and virtual referants
  8. How detailed must the simulation be?
  9. Just-in-time reality generation
  10. Simulations and Berkeley
  11. Conclusion

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - April 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page