Notes on Relation R
Belzer (Marvin)
Source: Analysis, Vol. 56, No. 1, Jan., 1996, pp. 56-62
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryNotes Citing this Paper

Philosophers Index Abstract

    This article shows that Parfit in Reasons and Persons uses the abbreviating phrase 'Relation R' in three distinct ways: (1) according to his explicit definition of the phrase, R is 'psychological connectedness and/or continuity'; (2) when he says identity according to the Psychological Criterion is 'nonbranching R' he assumes R is 'psychological continuity1'; and (3) in his arguments that it is R (not identity) that 'matters', R is 'psychological connectedness and continuity'. Some of the criticisms of his Division argument that identity does not 'matter' need to be reevaluated because they assume that the third reading of 'R' plays a role that it need not play.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2018. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page