Sobjectivity: The Anatomy of the Subjective and Objective in Moral Judgment
Kamm (F.M.)
Source: Kamm - Morality, Mortality (Vol. 1) - Death and Whom to Save from It, Chapter 9
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

OUP Abstract

  1. Looks at a two more approaches to justifying the Principle of Irrelevant Utility advanced in Ch. 8 with respect to the question of saving different groups of lives.
  2. Once again, it involves combining objective and subjective views. Here the combinations are designated ‘Sobjectivism1’ and ‘Sobjectivism2’. Sobjectivism2 differs from Sobjectivism1 (which was presented in Ch. 8), in that it pits the various subjective points of view against each other differently, taking into account each person's moral responsibility, rather than only his interests or desires.
  3. Sobjectivism3 provides an alternative principled distinction between losses of lives in order to distinguish relevant from irrelevant utilities: that certain utilities would be irrelevant in a life-saving choice situation if they would receive no proportional weight on their own, no matter how many individuals were involved.


Part II - Saving Lives: General Issues

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2020. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page