Pirahã Culture and Grammar: A Response to Some Criticisms
Everett (Daniel)
Source: Language, Jun2009, Vol. 85 Issue 2, p405-442, 38p
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. This paper responds to criticisms of the proposals of Everett (2005) by Nevins, Pesetsky, and Rodrigues (2009).
  2. It argues that their criticisms are unfounded and that Pirahã grammar and culture are accurately described in Everett (2005).
  3. The paper also offers more detailed argumentation for the hypothesis that culture can exert an architectonic affect on grammar.
  4. It concludes that Pirahã falsifies the single prediction made by Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002) that recursion is the essential property of human language.


Related to "Everett (Daniel) - Don't Sleep There are Snakes: Life and Language in the Amazonian Jungle".

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2020. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page