Spirituality, Religion and the Naturalist Challenge
Cottingham (John)
Source: Email
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Author’s Introduction

  1. The “undergraduate atheists” have had their day. The spiritually deaf onslaught of Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and their like has presented such an unfair and one-sided picture of religion that not only has it won few converts, but it may even have aided the cause of faith: if such crude tactics are the best the militant atheists can come up with (many open-minded readers must have thought) then perhaps religion is worth a second look after all.
  2. Of much greater interest, and vastly more intellectual sophistication, are two recent books, one by the Princeton philosopher Mark Johnston, the other by the French best-selling author André Comte-Sponville, formerly of the Sorbonne. Both are inspired by the achievements of modern science, both firmly reject the traditional idea of a transcendent creator, and yet both are sympathetic to our long heritage of spirituality, whose riches they would like to preserve if humanly possible.
  3. But can it be done? Mark Johnston, in his intriguingly titled "Johnston (Mark) - Saving God: Religion after Idolatry" (Princeton University Press, 2009) begins by insisting that “the causal mechanisms that lead to life, conscious awareness, and choice can be perfectly natural, that is, in accord with the laws of nature, and they may indeed take the form of random mutation and natural selection.” This is actually something that most theologians would now accept: why should not a divinely created cosmos develop and evolve in accordance with natural laws? But Johnston proceeds to rule out any transcendent creator by nailing his colours to the mast of ontological naturalism– the idea that there are no supernatural entities or forces, and that basic science explains all there is: it provides a “causally complete model of reality”.
  4. And now comes the distinctive twist. There is, Johnston argues, “a religious argument … that we should hope that ontological naturalism is true. For ontological naturalism would be a complete defense against … our tendency to servile idolatry and spiritual materialism”. Spiritual materialism involves retaining our ordinary selfish desires (for security, comfort, success, etc.) and trying to get them satisfied by manipulating supposed supernatural forces; idolatry is similar, placating the gods to get what we want. Authentic spirituality, by contrast, must address the “large-scale structural defects in human life” – arbitrary suffering, aging, the vulnerability of ourselves and our loved ones to time and chance and, ultimately, death. The religious or redeemed life, Johnston argues, is one where we are reconciled to these large-scale defects.


Forwarded by Fiona Ellis to me (by mistake?) - 31/08/10

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - April 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page