Theo Todman's Web Page - Paper Abstracts

Comments

1. The paper correctly points out that there is a continuum between standard medical technologies and “enhancements”, and that each needs to be treated on its merits, scientific / medical as well as “religious” / moral. The author doesn’t seem swayed by the “no playing God” lobby, as an a priori argument against transhumanism¹. He points out that some of the claims are too fanciful for theological reflection. He sees no reason why helpful developments shouldn’t be encouraged, provided the risks, side-effects and diversion of funds from more urgent matters are taken into account. He seemed (to my mind) too ready to accept the use of performance-enhancing drugs for exams and such-like₂. He points out that no amount of improvement and longevity is enough – but (cateris paribus), more is surely better.
2. Compare with
   1. "Regis (Ed) - Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition: Science Slightly over the Edge", and
   2. "Grossman (Lev), Kurzweil (Ray) - 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal".
3. A useful link: "CSC WG - Human Enhancement – A Discussion Document".