Notes on Plantinga, “Modalities: Basic Concepts and Distinctions”
Funkhouser (Eric)
Source: Funkhouser (Eric) - Metaphysics, Spring 2014
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Question

    ”Explain, in some detail, how Quine’s mathematical cyclist argument, as discussed in our Plantinga article, is supposed to serve as an objection to de re modality1. According to Plantinga, what is wrong with Quine’s argument? Along the way, be sure to explain the concept of de re modality2.”

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page